ArticleClinical epigenetics2026
Interplay of the nasal microbiome and epigenome among adolescents.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe respiratory microbiome, including that of the nasal cavity, is involved in host defense and airway pathophysiology. Interactions of the microbiome with the host immune system may impact health and disease susceptibility through changes in the epigenome. In this study, we aimed to analyze cross-sectional associations of nasal microbiome composition and the nasal epigenome among adolescents in the Project Viva cohort (N = 372, mean age: 13.0 years). We collected nasal swabs from anterior nares, profiled the microbiome by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing, and grouped samples into 6 clusters using partitioning around medoids. Nasal cell DNA methylation was measured with the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip. In an epigenome-wide association study, we tested for associations of microbiome cluster assignment and DNA methylation using robust linear models adjusting sociodemographics, season, batch, and surrogates of cell type composition. Among significant loci, we conducted differential abundance analysis to identify individual bacterial genera associated with DNA methylation levels.
resultsA total of 45 loci had differential methylation between two or more microbiome clusters (p
conclusionsOur findings support the hypothesis that the nasal microbiome is associated with small-to-modest variation in the nasal epigenome. Future research is needed to investigate how the relationship between the nasal microbiome and epigenome is impacted by environmental exposures, as well as the health effects of microbial and epigenetic variation in early life and across the life course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.