ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Next-Gen Restorative Materials to Revolutionise Smiles.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cariogenic Risk Modifies the Effect of Marginal Adaptation on Caries Adjacent to Posterior Composite Restorations: A Stratified Multivariate Analysis.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Bioactive Fillers in Bulk-Fill Composite Resins: A Comprehensive Review of the Effects on Polymerization Shrinkage Behavior and Mechanical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Materials and Techniques in Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Orthodontics (Second Edition).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bioactive and Ion-releasing materials in minimum intervention dentistry: a clinical pathway from prevention to restorative treatment.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs in materials science have driven transformative advancements in restorative dentistry. Advanced dental materials, such as bioactive materials, nanocomposites, and fibre-reinforced composites, are attracting attention. Bioactive materials, such as calcium silicate-based cements and bioactive glass, represent a paradigm shift by interacting with biological tissues to stimulate regeneration. They promote hydroxyapatite formation, accelerating mineralisation in hard and soft tissues, and are pivotal tools in minimally invasive procedures due to their functions of structural support and biological interaction. Nanomaterials, especially nanocomposites with embedded nanoparticles, effectively address polymerisation shrinkage and wear in traditional composites. With just 1.5% shrinkage, a flexural strength over 150 MPa, and 44-60% higher wear resistance than conventional composites, they offer significant improvements. Nanocomposites also provide enamel-like translucency and a bond strength of 27-38 MPa to dentin, ensuring excellent aesthetics and durability-making them ideal for direct restorations. Fibre-reinforced composites with glass or polymer fibres balance aesthetics with strength and are increasingly used in restorations. Their high fracture resistance, which closely approaches that of a natural tooth, enables clinicians to preserve more healthy teeth during restoration, in line with the principles of modern conservative dentistry. Overall, bioactive materials enhance tissue repair, nanocomposites optimise form and function, and fibre-reinforced composites deliver strength without compromising aesthetics. As these materials transition from research to clinical practice, they promise longer-lasting treatments, fewer complications, and higher patient satisfaction. This narrative review aims to explore three types of advanced dental materials and their role in improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.