Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749705›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Smart Devices and Multimodal Systems for Mental Health Monitoring: From Theory to Application.

Andreea Violeta Caragață, Mihaela Hnatiuc, Oana Geman, Simona Halunga, Adrian Tulbure, Catalin J Iov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreea Violeta CaragațăFaculty of Mechanical, Industrial and Maritime Engineering, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900573 Constanta, Romania.
Mihaela HnatiucDepartment Electronic and Telecommunication, Constanta Maritime University, 900663 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-0530
Oana GemanDivision of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Simona HalungaFaculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information, Technology, National University for Science and Technology, POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7028-3921
Adrian TulbureInformatics and Electronics Department, "1 Decembrie 1918" University of Alba Iulia, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-6398
Catalin J IovDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technology, "Gh. Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6409-9466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart devices and multimodal biosignal systems, including electroencephalography (EEG/MEG), ECG-derived heart rate variability (HRV), and electromyography (EMG), increasingly supported by artificial intelligence (AI), are being explored to improve the assessment and longitudinal monitoring of mental health conditions. Despite rapid growth, the available evidence remains heterogeneous, and clinical translation is limited by variability in acquisition protocols, analytical pipelines, and validation quality. This systematic review synthesizes current applications, signal-processing approaches, and methodological limitations of biosignal-based smart systems for mental health monitoring. Methods: A PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, the Web of Science Core Collection, IEEE Xplore, and the ACM Digital Library for studies published between 2013 and 2026. Eligible records reported human applications of wearable/smart devices or multimodal biosignals (e.g., EEG/MEG, ECG/HRV, EMG, EDA/GSR, and sleep/activity) for the detection, monitoring, or management of mental health outcomes. The reviewed literature after predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria clustered into six themes: depression detection and monitoring (37%), stress/anxiety management (18%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)/trauma (5%), technological innovations for monitoring (25%), brain-state-dependent stimulation/interventions (3%), and socioeconomic context (7%). Across modalities, common analytical pipelines included artifact suppression, feature extraction (time/frequency/nonlinear indices such as entropy and complexity), and machine learning/deep learning models (e.g., SVM, random forests, CNNs, and transformers) for classification or prediction. However, 67% of studies involved sample sizes below 100 participants, limited ecological validity, and lacked external validation; heterogeneity in protocols and outcomes constrained comparability. Conclusions: Overall, multimodal systems demonstrate strong potential to augment conventional mental health assessment, particularly via wearable cardiac metrics and passive sensing approaches, but current evidence is dominated by proof-of-concept studies. Future work should prioritize standardized reporting, rigorous validation in diverse real-world cohorts, transparent model evaluations, and ethics-by-design principles (privacy, fairness, and clinical governance) to support translation into practice.

Indexed as

biomedical signalsdepressive disorderheart rate variabilitymachine learningmental healthmultimodal sensingremote sensing technologysmart deviceswearables

Identifiers

PMID41749705
PMCPMC12938191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.