ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Knee Joint Mechanics from Kinematic and Neuromuscular Inputs: A Proof-of-Concept Using the CAMS-Knee Datasets.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the feasibility of estimating tibiofemoral joint contact forces using deep learning models trained on in vivo biomechanical data. Leveraging the comprehensive CAMS-Knee datasets, we developed and evaluated two machine learning network architectures, a bidirectional Long Short-Term-Memory Network with a Multilayer Perceptron (biLSTM-MLP) and a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) model, to predict medial and lateral knee contact forces (KCFs) across various activities of daily living. Using a leave-one-subject-out validation approach, the biLSTM-MLP model achieved root mean square errors (RMSEs) as low as 0.16 body weight (BW) and Pearson correlation coefficients up to 0.98 for the total KCF (Ftot) during walking. Although the prediction of individual force components showed slightly lower accuracy, the model consistently demonstrated high predictive accuracy and strong temporal coherence. In contrast to the biLSTM-MLP model, the TCN model showed more variable performance across force components and activities. Leave-one-feature-out analyses underscored the dominant role of lower-limb kinematics and ground reaction forces in driving model accuracy, while EMG features contributed only marginally to the overall predictive performance. Collectively, these findings highlight deep learning as a scalable and reliable alternative to traditional musculoskeletal simulations for personalized knee load estimation, establishing a foundation for future research on larger and more heterogeneous populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.