ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Evaluation of DeepLabCut Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for High-Precision Markerless Tracking in the Mouse Staircase Test.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise quantification of fine motor behaviour is essential for understanding neural circuit function and for evaluating therapeutic interventions in neurological disorders. While markerless pose estimation frameworks such as DeepLabCut (DLC) have transformed behavioural phenotyping, the choice of convolutional neural network (CNN) backbone has a critical impact on tracking performance, particularly in tasks involving small distal joints and frequent occlusions. In this study, we present the first systematic comparison of nine CNN architectures implemented in DLC for lateral-view analysis of skilled reaching movements in the Montoya Staircase test, a gold-standard assay for forelimb dexterity in rodent models of stroke and neurodegenerative disease. Using a dataset comprising both control and primary motor cortex (M1)-lesioned mice, we evaluated model performance across six key dimensions: spatial accuracy (RMSE, PCK@5 px), mean average precision (mAP), robustness to occlusions, inference speed, and GPU memory usage. Our results demonstrate that multi-scale DLCRNet architectures substantially outperform conventional backbones. DLCRNet_ms5 achieved the highest overall accuracy, while DLCRNet_stride16_ms5 provided the most favourable balance between precision and computational efficiency. These findings provide practical methodological guidance for neuroscience laboratories and highlight the importance of CNN architecture selection for the reliable quantification of fine motor behaviour in preclinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.