Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749764›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Integrating Fine-Tuning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Healthcare AI Systems: A Scoping Review.

Bernardo G Collaco, Prabha Srinivasagam, Cesar A Gomez-Cabello, Syed Ali Haider, Ariana Genovese, Nadia G Wood, Sanjay Bagaria, Mark A Lifson, Antonio Jorge Forte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bernardo G CollacoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3845-2646
Prabha SrinivasagamDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Cesar A Gomez-CabelloDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Syed Ali HaiderDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-5621-2861
Ariana GenoveseDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Nadia G WoodDepartment of Radiology AI IT, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2685-6427
Sanjay BagariaDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Mark A LifsonCenter for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-7930
Antonio Jorge ForteDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2004-7538

Funding

Gerstner Philanthropies naSchmidt Family Foundation na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in healthcare but are constrained by hallucinations, static knowledge, and limited domain specificity. Fine-tuning (FT) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offer complementary solutions, with FT embedding domain reasoning and RAG enabling dynamic, up-to-date knowledge access. Hybrid FT + RAG frameworks have been proposed to improve factual accuracy and clinical reliability. This scoping review synthesizes current evidence on such hybrids in healthcare AI. (2) Methods: The search across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and Embase identified studies implementing explicit FT + RAG hybrids in healthcare or biomedical tasks. Eligible studies reported empirical evaluations of LLM performance or behavior. Data were extracted on base models, FT strategies, RAG architectures, applications, and performance outcomes. (3) Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria. FT + RAG systems consistently outperformed FT-only or RAG-only approaches across QA, clinical summarization, report generation, and decision support tasks. Parameter-efficient FT methods (e.g., LoRA) were common, while RAG implementations varied (dense, hybrid, hierarchical, multimodal, federated). Reported benefits included improved accuracy, reduced hallucination, and greater clinician preference and feasibility in protected settings. (4) Conclusions: FT + RAG frameworks represent a promising direction for clinically grounded healthcare AI, combining domain-specific reasoning with transparent, up-to-date retrieval. Future work should prioritize standardized evaluation, workflow integration, and governance to enable safe deployment.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencefine-tuninghealthcarelarge language modelsparameter-efficient fine-tuningretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID41749764
PMCPMC12938813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.