ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Global Research Trends in Extracellular Vesicle-Based Therapy for Regenerative Medicine: A Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2024).
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regenerative Therapy at the Crossroads: From Cell-Based to Cell-Free Precision Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dysregulated Repair in Aging and Disease: Extracellular Vesicles as an Emerging Protective Strategy.Cells · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as promising cell-free therapeutic agents in regenerative medicine due to their ability to deliver bioactive molecules with enhanced stability and low immunogenicity. Their potential to replicate stem cell functions without the risks of live-cell transplantation has catalyzed a surge in global research.
objectiveThis study aims to perform a scientometric analysis of EV-based regenerative medicine research from 2014 to 2024, identifying publication trends, influential contributors, thematic clusters, and translational challenges.
methodsData were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using CiteSpace software. The analysis included journal impact mapping, co-authorship networks, co-citation analysis, and thematic cluster identification. Metrics such as citation bursts, total link strength, and silhouette values were used to assess influence and thematic coherence.
resultsThe most prolific journals were Stem Cell Research & Therapy and International Journal of Molecular Sciences. China led in publication volume, while the USA dominated citation impact. Foundational works by Théry and Lai, including the MISEV guidelines, shaped methodological standards. Nine thematic clusters were identified, including oxidative stress, small EVs, mesenchymal stromal cells, muscle regeneration, and chronic kidney disease. A strategic shift toward engineered EVs and novel sources such as iPSCs and macrophages was evident. Key translational barriers include lack of standardization, scalability issues, and regulatory ambiguity.
conclusionsEV-based therapies are transitioning from foundational research to clinical application. Overcoming methodological and regulatory challenges will be critical to realizing their full therapeutic potential in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.