ReviewCancers2026
The Paradox of Senescence in Glioblastoma: SASP as an Emerging Cancer Hallmark.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inflamed Yet Immune-Evasive? A Transcriptomic Meta-Analysis Identifies Conserved Inflammatory, Developmental, and Neuronal Signatures Associated with Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Towards a personalized perspective on gliomas: an epigenetic-immuno-inflammatory aging framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular senescence has been traditionally viewed as a tumor-suppressive program that halts its proliferation in response to oncogenic stress or DNA damage. However, recent studies have highlighted a paradoxical role for senescence in glioblastoma (GBM), IDH-wildtype, the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Accumulating evidence indicates that senescence represents a "frequent and durable" cell fate in GBM, particularly following standard therapies such as temozolomide and radiotherapy. Senescent cells frequently persist after temozolomide or radiotherapy and acquire a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) composed of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and matrix-remodeling enzymes. These factors not only promote tumor cell survival with stemness-induction but also reshape the pro-tumorigenic microenvironment with metabolic rewiring and immune evasion. Notably, senescence also arises in non-malignant cells-including astrocytes, endothelial cells, microglia, and infiltrating immune cells-creating a multicellular senescent niche that fuels recurrence. Here, we describe a recent advance in our understanding of senescence and SASP in the pathobiology of GBM. We further focus on a state-of-the-art, challenging exploration of the idea that single-cell and spatial profiling, capable of identifying senescence- and SASP-associated morphologic and heterogeneous states, will further refine patient selection and therapeutic timing. By reframing senescence as a modifiable determinant of GBM evolution, this review underscores its emerging significance as both a cancer hallmark and a therapeutic vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.