ArticleCancers2026
Inpatient Rehabilitation Improves Physical and Mental Health in Multiple Myeloma: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study evaluated the impact of standard inpatient rehabilitation on physical and mental health outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Since prior data showed that physical activity (PA) is beneficial for patients with MM, this study assessed (1) the onset and (2) durability of these benefits with and without rehabilitation.
methodsSixty patients with MM, undergoing a three-week rehabilitation program in the rehabilitation clinic of the University of Freiburg between April 2022 and September 2023, were assessed at three time points: baseline (T0), post-rehabilitation (T1), and 3-months post-rehabilitation (T2). Six patients, declining rehabilitation, were also examined. Tests included the timed-up-and-go-test (TUGT), handgrip strength, laboratory parameters, subjective fitness-rating, validated questionnaires for PA, fatigue, depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL: SF-12, R-MCI).
resultsPatients showed meaningful improvements in physical function, TUGT, and grip strength from T0 to T1. Fatigue, depression, and HRQoL improved considerably. After their return home (T2), 80% of patients remained physically active. Patients reported substantially higher subjective physical fitness at T2 compared to T0, improving to 5.0 from 3.1 on a 10-point scale, respectively. Non-rehabilitation-undergoing patients were fitter at baseline but did not improve in any tests/questionnaires at T1.
conclusionsStructured three-week rehabilitation led to a substantial improvement in both the physical and psychological well-being of patients with MM, despite their compromised bone health. These effects persisted 3-months after patients' dismission home. The non-rehabilitation group showed no comparable improvement, underscoring the potential benefit of structured rehabilitation in enhancing HRQoL, fatigue, and depression. Continued post-rehabilitation support is pertinent to sustain these benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.