Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749902›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

The Role of New Agents and Supportive Care in a Multimodal Approach to Cancer Cachexia.

Egidio Del Fabbro, Sudeep Pandey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Egidio Del FabbroDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1245-6307
Sudeep PandeyDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-222X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the multi-faceted nature of cancer cachexia, a combination of pharmacologic and supportive measures such as exercise and nutrition seems intuitive to most clinicians. Clinical trials have also suggested that a multimodal approach to cancer cachexia (CC) is feasible and potentially effective. However, past trials have been limited by medications that were partially effective or had the potential for serious adverse events such as thromboembolism. We review new agents that have demonstrated efficacy in phase II trials or are involved in multi-center phase III studies. The advent of several recent phase II studies indicate that consistently effective, well-tolerated medications may soon be available for CC. These new agents target several mechanisms involved in CC, including food aversion, catabolism, and decreased anabolism. Several multi-center studies are expected to be actively recruiting this year. If these agents prove to be effective, individualized treatment may be possible, guided by individuals' phenotype and/or clinical biomarkers. Future research should also determine whether combination therapy (pharmacologic and/or non-pharmacologic) produces additive or synergistic benefits.

Indexed as

anabolismcachexiaclinical trialsGDF-15multimodalsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID41749902
PMCPMC12938922

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.