ReviewCancers2026
AI in High-Frequency Micro-Ultrasound: Advancing Prostate Imaging from Segmentation to Cancer Detection.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Detection to Surveillance: The Evolving Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveHigh-frequency micro-ultrasound (micro-US) offers real-time, high-resolution imaging for prostate cancer. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in enhancing micro-US interpretation, a comprehensive review of this emerging field is currently missing. This review synthesizes current evidence on AI applied to ExactVu 29 MHz micro-US for prostate cancer.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2025. Studies were included if they applied machine learning or deep learning directly to 29 MHz micro-US data and reported quantitative performance metrics.
resultsTen studies met the inclusion criteria: six on prostate cancer detection, three on prostate segmentation and one on micro-US-histopathology registration. Detection models ranged from classical quantitative ultrasound machine learning to deep architectures using self-supervision, transformers, multiple-instance learning, ensemble calibration and 3D segmentation-based pipelines. Among core-level models for clinically significant cancer, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values clustered around 0.76-0.81; one lesion-level framework reported an AUROC of 0.92, though at a non-comparable analytical unit. Segmentation studies achieved accurate prostate delineation (Dice similarity coefficient ≈ 0.94), and a single study demonstrated high-precision 3D registration to whole-mount histopathology (Dice similarity coefficient 0.97 and landmark error < 3 mm). All studies evaluated AI on previously acquired data, without real-time clinical implementation.
conclusionsAI for micro-US shows promising and reproducible early results across detection, segmentation and registration, but evidence is still limited. In view of the potential of AI to optimize micro-US utilization and its related advantages, additional efforts are warranted to achieve clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.