ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mechanisms and Contingencies of Stress in University Students: A Systematic Scoping Review of Stress Mediators and Moderators.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the contingencies involved in the stress process in university students by identifying evidence obtained through conditional process analyses. A systematic scoping review of mixed study designs was carried out following the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Redalyc, and Wdg. Búsqueda were searched for original studies published in full through August 2025 that reported conditional process analysis with stress as the outcome. After screening 1033 records, a total of 30 articles met the inclusion criteria. The main perspectives used in the included studies involved individuals' beliefs about themselves and their future, highlighting the importance of personal resources and their relationship to perceived stress. The studies show a clear predominance of mediation analysis (25/30) over moderation analyses (2/30), along with limited inclusion of physiological (3/30) or multimodal measurements (1/30). Our synthesis provides a basis for advancing the understanding of the stress process in university students, indicating eight general perspectives of study to account for the intervening variables: standards for oneself, motivation, cognitive content, repetitive negative thinking, self-regulatory psychological resources, current status, social resources and environmental demands, and coping orientation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.