ReviewBrain sciences2026
Beyond Adversity: Definitions, Retrospective Assessment, and Experimental Manipulation of Positive Early-Life Experiences.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wealth of research in neuroscience and developmental psychology has documented the lasting detrimental effects of adverse early-life experiences on health and psychological well-being. To investigate these effects, researchers have developed self- and informant-report questionnaires, interview-based instruments, and experimental paradigms designed to assess exposure to early adversity, model its consequences under controlled laboratory conditions, and investigate the neurobiological mechanisms involved. In contrast, the role of positive early-life experiences in biobehavioral trajectories and adaptive functioning has received comparatively less empirical and theoretical attention. The existing work has largely conceptualized positive experiences in terms of their protective or buffering effects in the context of adversity, and/or their promotive role and independent contribution to physical and psychological well-being. Against this background, this narrative review comprehensively synthesizes (i) current definitions of positive early-life experiences, (ii) tools for their retrospective assessment, and (iii) experimental approaches aimed at manipulating and promoting such experiences in humans. Furthermore, this review advances time-sensitive and individual-centered attention for the study of positive early-life experiences, in which health- and well-being-promoting interventions are informed by an expanding understanding of normative human neuroplasticity as a heterosynchronous process and by dynamic, interdependent interactions operating across individual, family, and societal levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.