ArticleBiomolecules2026
MAKA-Map: Real-Valued Distance Prediction for Protein Folding Mechanisms via a Hybrid Neural Framework Integrating the Mamba and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-valued inter-residue distance maps provide essential spatial information for understanding protein folding mechanisms and guiding downstream applications such as function annotation, drug discovery, and structural modeling. However, existing prediction methods often struggle to capture long-range dependencies and to maintain topological consistency across different structural scales. To address these challenges, we propose a novel prediction framework that integrates a Mamba architecture, based on a selective state space model, to effectively model global interactions, and incorporates the Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) to enhance nonlinear structural representation. Extensive experiments on standard benchmark datasets, including CASP13, CASP14, and CASP15, demonstrate prediction accuracies of 86.53%, 85.44%, and 82.77%, respectively, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches. These results indicate that the proposed framework substantially improves the fidelity of real-valued distance prediction and offers a promising tool for downstream structural and functional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.