ReviewBiomolecules2026
Carbon Monoxide Therapy: Evidence and Prospects for Preventing and Treating Retinal Diseases.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In carbon monoxide (CO) therapy, CO is administered at low concentrations as a controlled solution; this approach enables the drug to achieve its cytoprotective properties, including anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and vasodilatory effects. CO therapy, initially reported to benefit cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions, is now used to treat ocular diseases in preclinical models. Carbon monoxide, a compound most famously known for its deleterious effects, is receiving more attention as a potential therapeutic candidate in ocular medicine. In a few studies, controlled low-dose CO therapy has shown anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects in various models of retinal disease (such as retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury, optic nerve crush, ocular hypertension, and autoimmune uveitis). We have summarized the clinical and preclinical findings, along with the potential therapeutic value of CO, in this review. In this context, the current and emerging CO delivery methods are also described, with a focus on exploring their safety, efficacy, and applicability in retinal disorders. Although a strong preclinical paradigm exists, clinical translation is limited at best. While some trials indicate acceptable safety levels for inhaled CO or CORM-based interventions, these results have not been robust or reproducible. Bridging this efficacy gap will rely on enhanced delivery strategies, stringent PK/PD-informed dosing, and mechanism-specific endpoint-based trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.