ReviewBiomedicines2026
Exosome-Based Therapeutics in Dermatology and Beyond: A Narrative Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exosome-Mediated Rewiring of Oxidative Stress-Inflammation-ECM Remodeling Axis Mitigates UVB-Triggered Skin Photoaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles that package DNA fragments, several classes of RNA, lipids, and proteins, and are now regarded as active messengers between cells rather than as cellular debris. This narrative review synthesizes dermatologic and related regenerative applications reported between 2020 and 2025, drawing on PubMed and Scopus searches. In skin, exosomes regulate inflammation, angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, pigmentation, and hair cycling. Preclinical models show faster wound closure, improved scar architecture, attenuation of photoaging changes, and stimulation of hair growth, with additional signals in inflammatory dermatoses and fungal skin disease. Early human studies in wound care, rejuvenation, scars, and alopecia suggest acceptable safety and a recurring pattern of benefit when exosomes are used as adjuncts to microneedling, lasers, or standard dressings, although products, dosing, and outcome measures remain heterogeneous. Beyond dermatology, early work in osteoarticular and soft tissue repair points toward meaningful regenerative potential, but clinical programs are still at an early stage. In practice, exosomes are being positioned as acellular alternatives or add-ons to platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and conventional topicals and as emerging carriers for small molecules and biologics. Key limitations include low yields, product and cargo heterogeneity, lack of agreed quality and potency metrics, and uncertain regulatory status. Whether exosomes remain boutique adjuncts or become part of standard dermatologic and musculoskeletal practice will depend on what happens next: consistent manufacturing, agreed-upon characterization panels, meaningful potency assays, robust pharmacokinetic and biodistribution data, and comparative trials that track outcomes and safety over years rather than weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.