ReviewBiomedicines2026
Evolving Therapeutic Algorithms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Integrating Efficacy, Safety, and Survivorship.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has undergone a significant shift over the past two decades, transitioning from a fatal malignancy to a chronic, highly manageable disease with near-normal life expectancy for most patients. This transformation has been driven by the development of BCR-ABL1-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which have enabled durable disease control and deep molecular responses (DMRs) in the majority of patients with chronic-phase CML. As long-term survival outcomes have plateaued across available agents, contemporary management has shifted beyond disease suppression toward optimizing long-term safety, quality of life, and the achievement of treatment-free remission (TFR). This review summarizes current evidence on molecular monitoring strategies, the comparative efficacy and toxicity profiles of first-, second-, and third-generation TKIs, and emerging advances in response assessment. Patient-centered TKI selection is discussed in the context of cardiovascular risk, comorbidities, treatment tolerability, and survivorship goals, reflecting the growing emphasis on individualized therapy in chronic-phase CML. Molecular monitoring strategies are examined in parallel, highlighting the clinical importance of early and sustained DMRs in guiding therapeutic decisions and TFR eligibility. Although RT-qPCR remains the standard for molecular monitoring, emerging high-sensitivity techniques such as digital droplet PCR and next-generation sequencing provide complementary value by improving the detection of low-level residual disease, refining risk stratification, and enabling earlier identification of resistance. Emerging therapeutic strategies and advances in response assessment further highlight ongoing efforts to enhance the depth and durability of remission while minimizing long-term toxicity. These developments support a more precise, individualized, and outcome-driven approach to modern CML management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.