ArticleGenes2026
Prenatal Microarray Analysis of Pregnancies Without Ultrasound Anomalies: Establishment of Copy Number and Homozygosity Frequencies in Low-Risk Population.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe overall objective of this study is to examine prenatal patients ascertained without an abnormal ultrasound (US) or an abnormal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) finding to provide a unique understanding of pathogenic copy number variants, identity by descent (IBD) and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in a normal population.
methodsThis study retrospectively provides an analysis of over 28,362 prenatal specimens ascertained without an abnormal US or abnormal cfDNA finding utilizing an SNP microarray. These specimens include at least 10 different ascertainment groups, including advanced maternal age (AMA), anxiety, abnormal maternal serum screen (MSS) with/without AMA, and a previous or familial child/pregnancy with a chromosome abnormality or a genetic disorder.
resultsThis study provides a basic understanding of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs), homozygosity and VUSs in an essentially normal population. This low-risk population has a frequency of pathogenic CNVs of ~1.26%; however, ~52% were associated with neurodevelopmental microdeletions/microduplications and ~13% were associated with incidental findings. Overall, ~1.32% of these patients showed an increase in homozygosity, the majority due to consanguinity. Lastly, VUSs were seen in 1.41% of this group, of which ~90% were familial.
conclusionsOverall, these findings provide a better estimate of the baseline frequencies and types of pathogenic CNVs and homozygosity in a low-risk population. It provides insight into the distribution of stretches of homozygosity associated with identity by descent in this population and gives a better understanding of the extent of variants of uncertain significance in phenotypically unaffected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.