ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Stakeholder Consensus on Strategies for Collaboration Between Traditional and Biomedical Mental Health Services in Post-Conflict Tigray, Ethiopia.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Burden of veno-occlusive disease in tigray region of ethiopia: Evidence from community-based survey.Scientific African · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ongoing conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa negatively affect the population's mental health and weaken health care systems. Collaboration among stakeholders is recommended to strengthen mental health services in post-conflict settings, despite limited evidence on context-specific strategies. This paper aimed to identify strategies for collaboration between traditional and biomedical services to improve mental health care. An adapted nominal group technique was employed during a one-day stakeholder workshop. Fourteen participants representing traditional and biomedical mental health services discussed and prioritised strategies based on importance and feasibility to reach consensus. Five collaborative care strategies were prioritised based on stakeholder consensus regarding importance and feasibility: (1) collaborative learning, (2) formalising coordination, (3) capacity building, (4) joint intervention programs, and (5) regulatory support. Key mechanisms for implementing these strategies were also identified, including piloting integrated interventions, appointing a dedicated focal person to coordinate, providing basic psychosocial counselling skills, reducing harmful practices, and strengthening supportive supervision. Mutual learning was identified as a crucial cross-cutting component of all approaches. The conclusion was that implementing these prioritised strategies could improve mental health care. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in enhancing collaborative care and improving mental health outcomes for individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.