Evidence mapPaperPMID 41752639Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026

Pancreatic Metastases from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Diagnostic Insights from Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy.

Alexandru Constantinescu, Ion Dina, Maria Nedelcu, Vlad Dumitru Băleanu, Vasile Florescu, Laura Enache, Octavian Andronic, Daniel Voiculescu, Ancuța Năstac

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandru ConstantinescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0007-1162-5777
Ion DinaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-4890
Maria NedelcuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0008-8888-1936
Vlad Dumitru BăleanuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Vasile FlorescuDepartment of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Laura EnacheDepartment of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Octavian AndronicFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-0018
Daniel VoiculescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8998-658X
Ancuța NăstacFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0007-8970-8863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer, accounting for approximately 75-80% of all renal carcinomas, and is often diagnosed incidentally on abdominal imaging, such as abdominal ultrasound or CT scan. Among other types of renal cancer, ccRCC is recognized to be highly aggressive due to its metastatic potential, which leads to a poor prognosis and an increased mortality rate. The most common sites of ccRCC metastasis are the lung, lymph nodes, bone, liver, and adrenal glands. Clear cell RCC is the most frequent primary tumor associated with secondary pancreatic involvement, while overall, pancreatic metastases represent only 2-5% of all malignant pancreatic lesions. These metastases often occur many years after nephrectomy and may present as solitary or oligometastatic disease, frequently displaying a paradoxically favorable prognosis compared with other metastatic sites. The present narrative review we conducted emerged from presentations of ccRCC with pancreatic distant metastases, potentially labeled as primary pancreatic tumors on imaging studies, mimicking pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors due to the hypervascular nature of ccRCC. Four patients were investigated in our clinic for suspicious pancreatic lesions identified on CT imaging, involving both the head and body of the pancreas. The definitive diagnosis was established by performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and histopathological analysis of the collected tissue samples. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has emerged as a pivotal tool for obtaining tissue diagnosis, particularly when cross-sectional imaging is inconclusive. Through a synthesis of clinical data and literature, this article underscores the essential diagnostic role of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and its impact on therapeutic decision-making.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationKidney NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray Computedclear cell renal cell carcinomaendoscopic ultrasoundEUS-FNBpancreatic metastases

Identifiers

PMID41752639
PMCPMC12942382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.