Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752905›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Isolation and Purification of Bacterially Produced Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Mechanisms, Limitations, and Current Advances.

Ľubomíra Jurečková, Daniela Chmelová, Miroslav Ondrejovič, Stanislav Miertuš

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ľubomíra JurečkováDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, J. Herdu 2, SK-91701 Trnava, Slovakia.ORCID 0009-0000-5362-3090
Daniela ChmelováDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, J. Herdu 2, SK-91701 Trnava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-9323-5121
Miroslav OndrejovičDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, J. Herdu 2, SK-91701 Trnava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-7840
Stanislav MiertušDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, J. Herdu 2, SK-91701 Trnava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6766-4571

Funding

EU NextGenerationEU through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Slovakia 09I03-03-V04-00499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are microbial polyesters that belong to a group of bioplastics with the potential to replace petroleum-derived plastics. Their main drawback is the high production cost, which puts them at a disadvantage compared to conventional plastics. A significant part of these costs arises from the isolation of PHAs from the cellular biomass of producing microorganisms. This review summarizes the main approaches used to recover both scl- and mcl-PHAs from native or dried (lyophilized) biomass, with attention to physical, chemical, and biological methods. Key parameters influencing extraction efficiency, polymer purity, and the final material properties are discussed, including pretreatment steps that often determine the overall outcome. The review also compares traditional halogenated solvent extraction with more environmentally acceptable alternatives and considers how different strategies can be combined to improve recovery. The current literature highlights the need for sustainable and economically acceptable processes that would make large-scale PHA production more feasible.

Indexed as

bacteriaextractionisolationmcl-PHApolyhydroxyalkanoatesscl-PHA

Identifiers

PMID41752905
PMCPMC12942554

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.