Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752907›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Air Pollution, Pollen, and Indoor Exposures in Allergic Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review.

Clara Martinez-Perez, Ana Paula Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clara Martinez-PerezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, Reina Mercedes S/N, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-5007
Ana Paula OliveiraInstituto Superior de Educação e Ciências de Lisboa (ISEC Lisboa), Alameda das Linhas de Torres, 179, 1750-142 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-8141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental exposures are increasingly recognized as important drivers of ocular surface inflammation, yet their combined contribution to the onset, exacerbation, and clinical burden of allergic conjunctivitis (AC) has not been comprehensively synthesized. This systematic review evaluated the evidence linking air pollutants, aeroallergens, and indoor or occupational exposures with allergic conjunctivitis. The review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR-2 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251162399). PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to 18 September 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the MINORS tool. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing more than three million outpatient visits. Consistent associations were observed between particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone with increased AC incidence and symptom severity, with variations by age, sex, and season. Pollen and air pollutants frequently acted synergistically. Indoor exposures were associated with increased risk in children, while occupational settings demonstrated exposure-response relationships. Experimental studies identified mechanisms involving epithelial barrier disruption, NF-κB activation, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin signaling. Overall, environmental exposures substantially contribute to allergic conjunctivitis and may inform improved prevention and personalized clinical management.

Indexed as

air pollutionallergic conjunctivitisbiomarkersenvironmental exposuresoccupational riskpollensystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41752907
PMCPMC12941877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.