Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41752945›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advancing Prenatal Diagnosis: From Conventional Karyotyping to Genome-Wide CNV Analysis.

Elitsa Gyokova, Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova, Elizabeth Odumosu, Kamelia Dimitrova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elitsa GyokovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-7961
Eleonora Hristova-AtanasovaDepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-0329-6081
Elizabeth OdumosuFaculty of Medicine, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Kamelia DimitrovaFaculty of Medicine, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0009-0005-3471-0566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in genome-wide DNA-based technologies have fundamentally transformed prenatal genetic diagnostics, enabling detection of clinically significant submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities that are not identifiable by conventional cytogenetic methods. These developments have important implications for the diagnosis and management of pregnancies complicated by fetal structural abnormalities, as they enable more accurate etiological diagnosis, improved prognostic assessment, and more informed clinical decision-making and reproductive counselling.

methodsThis narrative review synthesizes contemporary international evidence on prenatal genetic diagnostic approaches, including conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and genome-wide sequencing technologies. The review focuses on diagnostic performance, clinical utility, ethical considerations, and implementation within diverse healthcare systems.

resultsAccumulating evidence demonstrates that genome-wide approaches-particularly CMA and sequencing-based methods-provide a higher diagnostic yield in fetuses with structural anomalies, with an incremental yield of approximately 3-5% over conventional karyotyping. This is mainly due to their ability to detect pathogenic copy number variants below the cytogenetic resolution of karyotyping. These technologies improve etiological insight, enhance genotype-phenotype correlation, and support more precise prognostication and reproductive counselling, especially in pregnancies with fetal structural anomalies. Emerging sequencing platforms further expand the diagnostic spectrum by integrating copy number and sequence-level variant detection.

conclusionsGenome-wide Copy Number Variation (CNV) analysis represents a critical component of contemporary prenatal diagnostics and should be integrated into invasive prenatal testing pathways in accordance with international recommendations. Genome-wide approaches need robust counselling frameworks and equitable health policy implementation to spread. The expense, lack of required experience, and variation in healthcare infrastructure across locations make widespread deployment difficult.

Indexed as

chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)copy number variations (CNV)fetal anomaliesinvasive testingprenatal diagnosiswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41752945
PMCPMC12941462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.