ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Role of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Endometrial Preparation for Embryo Implantation in In Vitro Fertilization.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been suggested as a supplementary approach for endometrial preparation in IVF. Clinical results continue to be inconsistent. This narrative review synthesises molecular and clinical information to elucidate the function of G-CSF in modifying endometrial receptivity and to identify patient categories most likely to benefit. A thorough assessment was conducted on published research on G-CSF administration in women with treatment-resistant thin endometrium, recurrent implantation failure, and unselected IVF populations. The research demonstrates that G-CSF has phenotype-dependent effects. Improvements in pregnancy and live birth rates are inconsistent and seem dependent on the reversibility of underlying tissue disease; nevertheless, G-CSF reliably increases endometrial thickness in instances of thin endometrium and may restore eligibility for transfer. G-CSF improves implantation and early pregnancy outcomes in repeated implantation failure patients without modifying endometrial morphology, indicating a functional mechanism linked to immune-stromal synchronisation rather than structural expansion. In contrast, randomised controlled studies show no therapeutic benefit in unselected IVF groups. Discrepancies in research outcomes may mostly be attributed to variations in patient phenotype, initial endometrial function, and the therapy setting. Thus, G-CSF should be considered a specific approach for endometrial conditioning rather than just a supplementary component of IVF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.