ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Frailty and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subclinical Atherosclerosis, Hyperlipidemia and New-Onset Diabetes Should Not Be Ignored Despite Initial Angiographic Exclusion of Significant Atherosclerotic Occlusive Arterial Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Frail to Fail: More Support for Less Reserve-Can Clinical Frailty Scale Predict Path to Liberation?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty is a multidimensional state of reduced physiological reserve that is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of outcomes in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). As populations age and cardiometabolic multimorbidity becomes more prevalent, understanding how frailty interacts with CVD pathology has important implications for risk stratification, clinical decision-making, and patient-centered care. Across diverse cardiovascular conditions and interventions, frailty independently predicts higher risks of mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), rehospitalization, procedural complications, functional decline, and reduced quality of life. Shared biological mechanisms-including chronic inflammation, sarcopenia, endothelial dysfunction, and the effects of multimorbidity and polypharmacy-help explain the strong and often bidirectional relationship between frailty and CVD, one that is reported by recent data to be multiplicative as well as additive. Importantly, frailty demonstrates prognostic value beyond traditional risk factors and varies in predictive performance depending on the assessment tool used. Finally, frailty should not be viewed as immutable; evidence shows that appropriate conditioning may slow the decline or even reverse frail or prefrail states. This narrative review aims to synthesize contemporary evidence on frailty definitions and assessment, epidemiology, mechanistic pathways linking frailty with CVD, associated outcomes, prognostic value, and emerging interventions relevant to CVD prevention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.