ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Menopause and Hormone Replacement Therapy: Clinical Decisions in Times of Uncertainty.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), characterized by a rise in heart rate of at least 30 beats per minute from supine to standing position without accompanying orthostatic hypotension, is one of the most common autonomic disorders with disabling cardiovascular and neurologic manifestations. Hormonal influence has been long recognized by the disorder predominantly affecting women of reproductive age, with frequent onset around menarche, exacerbation of symptoms before or during menses, and pregnancy being one of POTS triggers. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and menopause in women with POTS have not been studied, but issues surrounding HRT are highly relevant as women with POTS transition from reproductive age to menopause. Given a rising prevalence of POTS due to post-COVID onset and the US Food and Drug Administration recently removing the black box warning on estrogen-containing HRT formulations, informed decisions and risk assessments regarding HRT use in women with POTS are warranted. In this narrative review, existing studies on hormones and POTS and its common comorbidities are reviewed, and key points in decision-making on the use of HRT in women with POTS are discussed. In summary, for women with significant menopausal symptoms and/or exacerbation of POTS during the peri- or postmenopausal period, using some forms of HRT for treatment of menopausal symptoms may be considered, accounting for comorbidities, cardiovascular risk and other factors. Vaginal estrogen appears to be safe for most women while transdermal estrogen and micronized progesterone can be utilized for significant menopausal symptoms, although outcomes of their long-term use are unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.