Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41753165›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Activity and Damage Indices for Sjögren's Disease.

Elodie Portier, Maxime Beydon, Simon J Bowman, Raphaèle Seror

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elodie PortierDepartment of Immuno-Rheumatology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4698-045X
Maxime BeydonINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Equipe PEPITES, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-093X
Simon J BowmanRheumatology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-9948
Raphaèle SerorDepartment of Immuno-Rheumatology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-1856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary Sjögren's disease (SjD) is a systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations, ranging from isolated glandular dysfunction to multisystem involvement and severe complications. This variability complicates disease management, particularly the assessment of disease activity and long-term outcomes. Disease activity in SjD encompasses both systemic manifestations and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) remains the standard for systemic activity, while the ESSPRI complements these scores by capturing subjective symptom burden. These tools have limitations because they do not evaluate the same manifestations of SjD and may therefore respond differently to treatment. Thus, composite outcomes such as the Sjögren's Tool for Assessing Response (STAR) and the Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjögren Syndrome (CRESS) have been developed. They integrate improvements in ClinESSDAI, PROs, biological parameters and objective dryness, providing a more comprehensive measure of disease activity. Assessment of damage, defined as irreversible sequelae, remains an unmet need in SjD. Damage is a reflection of the natural evolution of the disease, and is also relevant to measuring the impact and health economic effects of therapeutic interventions. Existing measures, including cumulative ESSDAI, track longitudinal activity and reflect the severity of the disease, but do not specifically capture damage. In summary; SjD assessment requires complementary tools for systemic activity and PROs, with composite scores a recent innovation. An important remaining gap is a validated method to evaluate damage, essential to fully evaluate disease progression.

Indexed as

damagedisease activitySjögren’s disease

Identifiers

PMID41753165
PMCPMC12942109

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.