ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
The Potential Use of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Alzheimer's Disease Therapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and one of the greatest challenges of current medicine. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving β-amyloid deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, chronic neuroinflammation, and progressive neuronal loss. Despite the introduction of novel therapies, treatment efficacy remains limited, prompting the search for alternative therapeutic targets. One promising area of research focuses on matrix metalloproteinases-proteolytic enzymes involved in tissue remodeling, synaptic plasticity, and inflammatory responses. In the context of AD, MMPs may exert both protective effects, through amyloid degradation, and detrimental effects such as blood-brain barrier disruption and amplification of neuroinflammatory damage. Understanding the dual and context-dependent roles of MMPs may help explain past translational failures and enable the development of more selective, stage-dependent therapeutic strategies. This article is a narrative review summarizing current evidence on the roles of MMPs in AD, with a particular focus on their therapeutic modulation and potential implications for future clinical research. Insights into MMP biology may ultimately guide the design of interventions with improved efficacy and safety for patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.