ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Emerging Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: From In Vitro Insights to In Vivo Clinical Translation.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maxillary sinus augmentation is a key procedure for rehabilitating the atrophic posterior maxilla and enabling predictable implant-supported restorations. Although autogenous bone remains the biological gold standard due to its osteogenic potential, its clinical use has declined because of donor-site morbidity, limited availability, and increased surgical burden. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is currently the most widely used substitute, providing excellent biocompatibility and long-term volumetric stability. However, its inert nature, limited bioactivity, and slow resorption have driven the development of next-generation graft materials. Recent biomaterial innovations aim to enhance vascularization, accelerate osteogenesis, modulate immune responses, and achieve controlled resorption while maintaining favorable handling properties. These include ion-releasing bioactive ceramics, growth factor-enhanced allografts, polysaccharide-hydroxyapatite composites, smart hydrogels, and synthetic scaffolds with tunable degradation profiles. Given the complexity of bone regeneration, effective clinical translation requires an integrated framework combining in vitro assays, animal models, and human clinical studies. This review synthesizes evidence published since 2018 on emerging biomaterials for sinus floor elevation, critically evaluating their potential to overcome the limitations of DBBM and highlighting the importance of a coordinated preclinical-to-clinical research continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.