SynthesisNutrients2026
Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet and Its Association with Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diet quality measured using the Mediterranean diet score and anxiety during armed conflict.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHigh-quality diets are increasingly recognized as a promising strategy for alleviating mental health problems. This study aimed to evaluate the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet (ELD) and depression and anxiety using a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data, with any discrepancies resolved by consensus.
resultsUltimately, eight unique studies (10 comparisons) met the predefined inclusion criteria. Adjusted effect estimates (odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs)) and corresponding 95% confidence (95%CI) intervals were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified with the
conclusionsOur findings indicate that, compared with low adherence, high adherence to the ELD is associated with beneficial effects on mental health and may inform dietary recommendations for the early prevention and intervention of depression, anxiety, and their co-occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.