ReviewPharmaceutics2026
The Potential of Chronotherapy and Nanotherapy-Based Strategies for Glioblastoma Treatment.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peptide-Based Nanocomplexes Enable Transferrin-Mediated Uptake and p53-Driven Antitumor Activity in 2D and 3D Glioblastoma Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive brain tumour in adults, and despite ongoing efforts, effective treatment remains limited. Standard therapies often face challenges because of the tumour's specific biology, its aggressive nature, and the presence of certain physiological barriers in the brain that impede chemotherapeutics from reaching their target. Emerging research in circadian biology highlights the role of the internal circadian clock in tumour progression and treatment response. Evidence suggests that aligning therapy to patients' chronotypes could potentially improve treatment outcomes. At the same time, advances in nanotechnology-including functionalized nanoparticles for drug and/or gene delivery-show promising results while reducing side effects. Additionally, evolving and prominent artificial intelligence tools may significantly contribute to progress in the design of next-generation personalised therapies. This review provides a unique and integrative perspective by examining the hurdles in treating GB and exploring innovative strategies, such as the integration of nanotechnology into chronotherapy protocols, to enhance therapeutic efficacy. The Chronobiology-Nanotechnology combination could not only improve GB patients' survival rates but also lead to a more effective and less toxic personalised approach, distinguishing this work from previous reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.