Evidence mapPaperPMID 41755349Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Artificial intelligence for personalized multiple micronutrient supplementation in maternal health.

Gabriel Davis Jones, Aris T Papageorghiou, Hassan Shehata, Hema Divakar, Eline M Van der Beek, Vyta Senikas, Justin C Konje, Anne-Beatrice Kihara, Moshe Hod, FIGO Committee on Women's Health and Technology

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriel Davis JonesOxford Digital Health Labs, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-4814
Aris T PapageorghiouNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hassan ShehataRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.
Hema DivakarDivakars Speciality Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Eline M Van der BeekDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Vyta SenikasFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Justin C KonjeFeto Maternal Centre, Doha, Qatar.
Anne-Beatrice KiharaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Moshe HodSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
FIGO Committee on Women's Health and Technology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies remain pervasive, contributing to adverse pregnancy outcomes and long-term health risks for mothers and offspring. Multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) during pregnancy has demonstrated benefits, including reduced risks of low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age births, and neonatal mortality, when compared with standard iron-folic acid supplementation. Current MMS strategies, however, often follow a standard MMS, overlooking variations in nutritional status, health profiles, and context. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning and natural language processing, provide opportunities to strengthen maternal nutrition programs by integrating diverse data sources. Rather than promising fully individualized recommendations, AI could help stratify women by risk of insufficiencies or deficiencies, highlight groups most likely to benefit from additional support, and inform the design of more responsive supplementation strategies during preconception and pregnancy. We outline a conceptual model in which multimodal health data-including electronic health records (EHRs), wearable sensor outputs, nutrition and fertility app logs, genomic markers, and sociodemographic information-are aggregated and analyzed by AI systems to inform personalized MMS plans. The framework introduces the concept of a "nutritional digital twin," a virtual profile of the patient's nutritional and metabolic state. This digital twin can simulate micronutrient needs and predict maternal-fetal outcomes under different supplementation scenarios, enabling clinicians to test scenario-based options (e.g. standard MMS ± targeted add-ons) for individuals. We describe how deep learning models can identify complex patterns (e.g. diet-genome interactions or behavioral trends) while natural language processing (NLP) algorithms extract clinically relevant insights from unstructured data (such as medical notes or patient queries). In addition, we discuss the role of digital maternal health tools, such as mobile apps and wearable trackers, in supplying real-time data to the AI models and in engaging women to improve adherence to supplementation regimens. Harnessing AI for MMS could transform maternal nutrition care in both high- and low-resource settings. In high-income contexts, rich data (comprehensive EHRs, genetic tests, continuous monitoring devices) could feed advanced predictive models to support risk-stratified care with protocolized supplementation options, under clinical oversight. In low- and middle-income countries, where maternal undernutrition and micronutrient gaps are most prevalent, AI-driven approaches can help stratify risk groups and optimize limited resources. Ubiquitous mobile phone access and digital health tools in many such settings provide avenues for data collection and intervention delivery. We highlight examples where machine learning on population data revealed "hidden hunger" patterns and key predictors of low supplement uptake (e.g. low education, minimal antenatal visits)-insights that policymakers can use to target nutrition programs. A nutritional digital twin could further allow scenario-testing (e.g. predicting the impact of adding a vitamin D supplement for a specific patient) before clinical decisions are made. To realize this vision, the key concerns are ethics, credibility, and fairness. Ethical frameworks must guide development so that sensitive reproductive health data are protected and clinician oversight remains central. The credibility of AI-generated recommendations depends on transparency about the assumptions used to translate nutritional and health data into supplement type and dose, and on prospective validation against maternal and neonatal outcomes. This requires a continuous feedback loop in which recommendations are tested in real-world settings and recalibrated using outcomes data, ensuring that the system learns from observed benefits and harms, rather than relying solely on theoretical modeling. Fairness demands that training data sets represent diverse populations and that solutions are tailored to local contexts to reduce bias and avoid widening disparities. Critically, the approach must be fed by data streams that extend beyond initial demographics and clinical baselines to include biomarkers, adherence patterns, and pregnancy outcomes, so that the models can be refined and dosing rules adjusted over time. If these safeguards are embedded, AI-enhanced personalized MMS can move beyond proof of concept towards a credible, equitable, and empirically grounded contribution to global maternal health. AI-driven personalized nutrition support represents a frontier in obstetric care. By combining clinical knowledge with data-driven intelligence, we can move beyond generalized prenatal supplements towards precision maternal nutrition. The integration of deep learning models and digital health innovations into antenatal care pathways has the potential to better nourish pregnancies, save lives, and ensure healthier futures for mothers and children worldwide.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDietary SupplementsMaternal HealthMicronutrientsPrecision MedicineDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeMicronutrientsartificial intelligencedigital maternal healthlow‐ and middle‐income countriesmaternal nutritionmultiple micronutrient supplementationnutritional digital twinpersonalized nutritionrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41755349
PMCPMC13173597

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.