ArticleInternet interventions2026
Online-delivered 'Teaching Recovery Techniques' for young people with PTSD symptoms who have experienced forced migration: a pilot study.
Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although there is a high need for mental health support among individuals with experience of forced migration, there are barriers to accessing in-person interventions. Online delivery offers an alternative. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of online-delivered Teaching Recovery Techniques (TRT) for young people who had experienced forced migration and reported symptoms of PTSD. Methods: The study used an open, single-arm trial design with a mixed-methods approach. Participants ( Results: High fidelity was observed, with all components delivered except for elements of the final session. Technical challenges were noted, including limited platform functionality for private communication and unstable internet connectivity, and privacy concerns were raised where participants lacked private spaces. The format was adapted, including merging groups, delivering sessions twice weekly rather than weekly, and reducing session duration from 90 to 60 min. Of 16 participants, 9 completed post-intervention measures; descriptive data suggested completers were less likely to be female and had higher symptom scores. Qualitative data indicated symptom improvements and emphasised facilitators' relational qualities, but benefits were described as transient and insufficient to address ongoing stressors, with participants preferring in-person delivery. Conclusion: Online TRT needs enhanced technical support, privacy safeguards, and closure procedures; future trials should test efficacy and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.