ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2026
LDL-C lowering in patients treated with bempedoic acid in a real-world cohort.
Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is directly associated with cardiovascular disease, with the risk level determined by the magnitude and duration of exposure. In routine practice, there are limited data on the expected LDL-C lowering with bempedoic acid (BA) alone or in combination with ezetimibe (BA + EZE). Methods: Patients initiating BA or BA + EZE were identified in the Veradigm Network EHR linked to claims (index). LDL-C levels were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. To further examine BA and BA + EZE efficacy, patients were stratified by background statin use (12 months pre-index) and by continuous index therapy use (no therapy gap >45 days). Results: Of the 900 BA and 615 BA + EZE patients identified, median baseline LDL-C was 137 mg/dL and 127 mg/dL, respectively. By 3 months, BA (21%) and BA + EZE (33%, Conclusions: Patients initiating BA and BA + EZE experienced early and sustained LDL-C improvements. The greatest reductions were in patients with continuous use and patients with no evidence of prior statin use, underscoring the importance of long-term adherence and treating patients not on statin therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.