ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Key design elements and mechanisms for nature-based healing in China's National Parks: insights from expert interviews.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: National parks are increasingly expected to promote public health; however, healing-oriented design guidance remains fragmented and often detached from ecological red lines and measurable outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) determine the design elements consistently recognized as the key to enhancing nature-based healing effects; and (2) identify the priorities and bundling strategies among these elements and how can they be translated into actionable planning, design, and management recommendations, particularly in the Chinese context. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews (30-60 min) with 13 interdisciplinary experts involved in the national parks and near-natural landscapes in China. The transcripts were analyzed in NVivo using the six-phase thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke with a standardized codebook. Results: The following six themes emerged: (1) nature-based healing; (2) multisensory stimuli in the natural environment; (3) route rhythms; (4) management and operational strategies; (5) equity and needs for diversity; and (6) evidence base and outcomes evaluation. Discussion: This study contributes to an implementation-ready framework that links conservation limits to healing-oriented design and operations, and a scalable two-tier evaluation system. This advances practice by making restorative planning measurable, iterative, and accountable, helping managers translate multisensory and spatial rhythm insights into decisions that protect ecosystems while improving visitor wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.