Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756310›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

Tension shapes memory: computational insights into neural plasticity.

Ki Yun Lee, M Taher A Saif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ki Yun LeeDepartment of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
M Taher A SaifDepartment of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical forces have recently emerged as critical modulators of neural communication, yet their role in high-level cognitive functions remains poorly understood. Here, we present a biologically inspired spiking neural network model that integrates mechanical tension, vesicle dynamics, and spike-timing-dependent plasticity to examine how tension influences learning, memory, and cognitive operations such as pattern completion, projection, and association. We find that increased tension enhances synaptic efficiency by accelerating vesicle clustering and recovery, resulting in a 67% improvement in memory recall speed and a 17% increase in inter-regional synchrony during projection relative to relaxed states. Conversely, a 20% reduction in tension leads to a 31% decline in memory association performance, highlighting the tension-sensitive accessibility of stored information. The model further reveals that an appropriate balance of inhibition is essential for these tension-driven effects: networks with 20% inhibitory neurons achieve optimal spatial precision in memory encoding and recall, whereas insufficient inhibition allows tension-amplified excitation to spread uncontrollably and degrade recall fidelity. Together, these

Indexed as

cognitive functionmechanical tensionmemoryneural networkneuromodulationsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41756310
PMCPMC12932432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.