ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Evaluating the real-world safety of cholestyramine for the treatment of hyperlipidemia: disproportionality analysis of FAERS data.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypercholesterolemia is a significant risk factor for severe cardiovascular diseases. Cholestyramine lowers serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and is clinically indicated for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia, relieve itching symptoms caused by bile acid accumulation in cholestatic diseases (such as primary biliary cirrhosis), as well as to manage bile acid diarrhea resulting from bile acid metabolic disorders. With its widespread clinical application, it is essential to understand its safety in real-world settings. Methods: This study evaluated the clinical safety of cholestyramine by analyzing all adverse event reports since 2004 in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), where cholestyramine was identified as the primary suspected drug. Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) composite criteria method, Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), and Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) were used to analyze adverse events associated with cholestyramine. Results: The study results confirmed known adverse reactions of cholestyramine, such as constipation, abdominal discomfort, bloating, steatorrhea, bleeding tendencies, night blindness, hyperchloremic acidosis, osteoporosis, rashes, and local irritation caused by deficiencies in vitamins K, A, and D, which are also listed in the drug's package insert. Additionally, adverse reactions not documented in the package insert were identified, including off-label use, administration for unapproved indications, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fecal abnormalities (color changes, softening, hardening), blood glucose fluctuations, tooth fracture, and exacerbation of concurrent medical conditions. This study also underscores the importance of early detection of adverse reactions associated with cholestyramine. Conclusion: By providing insights into both known and potential adverse reactionsin real-world settings, the findings offer enhanced safety information to assist clinicians in prescribing cholestyramine for conditions such as hypercholesterolemia, cholestasis-associated pruritus, and bile acid diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.