Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The potential of event-related beta oscillations as biomarkers for neuromodulatory treatment efficacy.

Bettina Habelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bettina HabeltDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) recently celebrated its 100-year anniversary, having revolutionized the study of cognitive function across species. Over the past century, neuroelectric measures such as resting-state EEG, event-related potentials (ERP), and event-related oscillations (ERO) have become indispensable not only for advancing our understanding of brain function but also for identifying valuable biomarkers for diagnosing neurological and psychiatric disorders and evaluating the efficacy of novel therapies. Compared to resting state activity and ERPs, EROs-oscillatory dynamics time-locked to and modulated by task events-remain relatively underutilized in evaluating treatment outcomes, despite growing evidence of their potential. Our recent findings from a rat model of alcohol addiction indicate that event-related beta oscillations are sensitive markers of cognitive function and recovery following therapeutic interventions. Both pharmacological treatment with psilocybin and targeted electrical stimulation induced a shift in dominant beta activity from higher to lower sub-bands during an auditory oddball task, underscoring the importance of sub-band-specific analyses beyond aggregate beta power as potential indicators of treatment efficacy acknowledging functional distinctions within the beta range. Despite these promising observations, systematic investigations of beta sub-band activity for diagnosis and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders remain scarce. Here, I propose that event-related beta oscillations are an underexplored yet highly promising biomarker for evaluating the efficacy of neuromodulatory interventions, including brain stimulation and neurofeedback, in both preclinical and clinical settings.

Indexed as

addictionbeta oscillationbipolar (affective/mood) disordersbrain stimulationelectroencephalographyneurofeedbackobsessive-compulsive disorderschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID41756488
PMCPMC12932426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.