Evidence mapPaperPMID 41756762Full record

ReviewFrontiers in dementia2026

The 2024 NIA-AA biological definition of Alzheimer's disease: linking biomarkers to clinical practice.

Goh Kobayashi, Kosei Hirata, Maiko Ono, Kensaku Kasuga, Yuhei Takado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Goh KobayashiInstitute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Kosei HirataInstitute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Maiko OnoInstitute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Kensaku KasugaDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Yuhei TakadoInstitute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2024 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria establish a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (AD), marking a pivotal step toward linking research biomarkers with clinical practice. This review traces the evolution of AD diagnostic frameworks from the 1984 NINCDS-ADRDA clinical criteria, through biomarker-informed updates in 2011, to the 2024 biology-based criteria that bridge research and clinical care. The 2024 framework defines AD by its underlying pathology rather than clinical symptoms, recognizing that biomarker evidence alone can establish diagnosis. It expands the traditional AT (N) model into a multimodal profile (AT

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid PETA/T/N frameworkco-pathologiesfluid biomarkersNIA-AA 2024 diagnostic criteriaresiliencetau PET

Identifiers

PMID41756762
PMCPMC12932163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.