Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41757031›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Discovery and dynamic pharmacology of μ-opioid receptor positive allosteric modulators.

Evan S O'Brien, Junzheng Wang, Parthasaradhireddy Tanguturi, Mengchu Li, Elizabeth White, Yuki Shiimura, Barnali Paul, Kevin Appourchaux, Kaavya Krishna Kumar, Weijiao Huang and 5 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Evan S O'BrienDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-7722
Junzheng WangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Parthasaradhireddy TanguturiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, and the Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mengchu LiEdward F Domino Research Center, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Elizabeth WhiteDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.
Yuki ShiimuraDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.
Barnali PaulCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Anesthesiology and Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Kevin AppourchauxCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Anesthesiology and Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Kaavya Krishna KumarDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2283-4033
Weijiao HuangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.
Susruta MajumdarCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Anesthesiology and Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
John R TraynorEdward F Domino Research Center, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John M StreicherDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, and the Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-7362
Chunlai ChenState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0128-7766
Brian K KobilkaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Development of Hsp90 Isoform- Selective Inhibitors as a Novel Opioid Dose-Reduction TherapyR01DA052340 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI STREICHER, JOHN MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Efficacy and signaling modulation by targeting the sodium site at mu opioid receptorR01DA059978 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susruta Majumdar · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
The structural basis for pathway-selective signaling by the µ opioid receptorR01DA036246 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Brian K Kobilka · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036246NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052340NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid agonists such as morphine and fentanyl exert analgesic effects by binding and activating the μ-opioid receptor (μOR), yet agonism of the μOR causes a slate of serious side effects. μOR-mediated addiction and respiratory depression are the major causes of the current opioid overdose crisis, largely driven by the explosion in illicit use of fentanyl, a potent opioid receptor full agonist. Given these serious side effects (and high resulting societal cost), molecules that act as analgesics with distinct mechanisms of action are of great interest. Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the μOR have the potential to avoid many off-target side effects of conventional opioid orthosteric agonists by enhancing the signaling properties of natural opioid peptide systems. We used a DNA-encoded chemical library screening approach to selectively discover active-state-specific μOR PAMs. Two out of 3 selected prospective PAMs displayed the anticipated enhancement in agonist activity. The most effective of these compounds enhanced the activity of all orthosteric opioid agonists tested, including the native opioid peptide met-enkephalin. Little is known about the underlying dynamic basis of allosteric modulation of Family A GPCRs like the μOR. To that end, we used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments to detail the impact that our novel μOR PAM has on the dynamic activation behavior of a key region on the intracellular face of the receptor. Our results here provide both a new chemical scaffold that acts as a μOR PAM and detailed pharmacological and dynamic insights into its mechanism of action.

Identifiers

PMID41757031
PMCPMC12934670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.