ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Modified RNA Extraction Methods to Eliminate Agarose Impurities in Precision-Cut Lung Slices.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) have emerged as a powerful tool for studying the biology of viable human lung tissue. However, the presence of agarose impurities compromises RNA yield and integrity during the extraction process. We tested whether using an alternative Plant kit RNA extraction method to wash agarose impurities or pre-dissolving agarose from PCLS implementing a dissolving buffer for routine RNA isolation in gel-electrophoresis would improve RNA quantity, quality, and integrity. Our results show that RNA quantity and integrity are highly compromised when using a conventional method of RNA extraction. The plant kit and dissolution of agarose increased the RNA quantity to 0.42±0.11 and 0.65±0.17 μg/PCLS (measured by the Qubit) and integrity number to 6.60±0.59 and 9.13±0.39 (measured by the Bioanalyzer), respectively. The presence of impurities in conventional and Plant kit extractions misled to an overestimation of the RNA quantity and quality using the NanoDrop. The Plant kit and agarose dissolution showed a significant transcript integrity increase in GUSB (p<0.0001) and COL1A1 (p<0.05) expression, validating these methods over conventional extraction. We encourage laboratories applying PCLS experimentation to implement alternative methods to remove agarose impurities during RNA extraction, as well as to rely on sensitive quantitative techniques, such as the Qubit and Bioanalyzer, for RNA quantification and integrity measurements.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.