Evidence mapPaperPMID 41757188Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Biomarkers for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Towards Validation of a Biomarker-Enhanced Risk Model.

Daniel H Solomon, Leah Santacroce, Jon T Giles, Pamela Rist, Brendan M Everett, Katherine P Liao, Misti Paudel, Nancy A Shadick, Michael Weinblatt, Joan M Bathon and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel H SolomonDivision of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-5428
Leah SantacroceDivision of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-8951-2296
Jon T GilesDivision of Rheumatology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Pamela RistHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-3543-045X
Brendan M EverettHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6331-5224
Katherine P LiaoDivision of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-3200
Misti PaudelDivision of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Nancy A ShadickDivision of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Michael WeinblattDivision of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Joan M BathonDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Olga DemlerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-3355-3210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) disease risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is the leading cause of mortality. Improved CV risk stratification tools in RA could enhance use of preventative care and improve outcomes. Methods: We previously studied biomarkers of CV disease - adiponectin, hsCRP, Lp(a), osteoprotegerin (OPG), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT), serum amyloid A (SAA), YKL-40, soluble TNF receptor1 (sTNFR1) -- that were associated with CV risk. In the current study, these biomarkers were tested in an unrelated external cohort of RA patients followed at a single academic medical center without a history of CV events. CV events were identified through Medicare and Medicaid administrative data or through medical record review of self-reported events.Biomarkers were assessed at cohort entry among a nested cohort of cases and controls, matched 1:1 on sex and age. Analyses were conducted using conditional logistic regression. We examined whether the candidate biomarkers added to clinical CV risk factors improved model prediction, using the area under the curve (AUC) as well as the net reclassification index (NRI). Results: From a cohort of 1,345 eligible patients with RA, we identified 123 patients with confirmed CV events. Cases and matched controls were typical of RA: median age 63 years, 77% women, RA disease duration 11 years, 72% seropositive, 85% used a biologic or conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, 58% non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 30% oral glucocorticoids. From the candidate biomarkers, LASSO regression selected hsTnT and sTNFR1 as associated with CV events. The AUC for models that included only clinical risk factors was 0.758 (95% CI 0.689-0.829); after adding hsTnT and sTNFR1, the AUC increased to 0.802 (95% CI 0.718-0.998). The NRI of the model with biomarkers was 16.3%, with improvement only observed in patients who did not have CV events during follow-up. Conclusions: Adding selected biomarkers to clinical risk factors enhances the discrimination of models predicting CV events among patients with RA. These risk models require prospective testing to see if they have value in clinical practice decision-making regarding preventative care.

Indexed as

biomarkerscardiovascular diseaseRheumatoid arthritisrisk stratificationvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41757188
PMCPMC12934860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.