Evidence mapPaperPMID 41757274Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes research2026

Optimizing Metabolic Assessment: Maximal Fat Metabolism, Lactate Dynamics, and Cardiorespiratory Determinants at Different Pedaling Frequencies.

Ahmad Alkhatib

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ahmad AlkhatibSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, England, UK, bcu.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1244-1861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims/Objectives: Accurate metabolic exercise testing is essential for assessing cardiometabolic health in both athletes and clinical populations with prediabetes and diabetes. This study investigated whether and how fat, carbohydrates and lactate diagnostics are influenced by ergometry testing pedaling frequency. Methods: This randomized cross-over repeated-measures trial, examined human participants for cardiorespiratory oxygen uptake ( Results: Higher Conclusions: Metabolic assessments should prioritize absolute MFO and BLC dynamical changes over Fatmax intensities, when interpreting fat-oxidation capacity, particularly under varying pedaling frequencies. By jointly characterizing blood-based and respiratory-based diagnostics under different exercise assessment conditions, this study helps improve the reliability of diagnosing the metabolic status in both healthy individuals and patients with metabolic disease.

Indexed as

BicyclingExercise TestLactic AcidLipid MetabolismAdultCarbohydrate MetabolismCarbon DioxideCross-Over StudiesEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansMaleOxidation-ReductionOxygen ConsumptionYoung AdultCarbon DioxideLactic Acidcardiorespiratorycyclingexercise intensityfat oxidationindirect calorimetrymetabolismpedal rateweight loss

Identifiers

PMID41757274
PMCPMC12933878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.