Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Extended Anticoagulation Therapy With Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Associated Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism According to Different Performance Status Scores: Insights From the ONCO PE Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04724460 (Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy for Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy for Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ONCO PE (Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy for Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Cancer) trial demonstrated the superiority of 18-month compared with 6-month rivaroxaban treatment for cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism in reducing recurrent venous thromboembolism. However, it was uncertain whether the results could be applicable to patients with different performance status (PS) scores, which evaluate the physical condition of patients with cancer undergoing anticancer treatment.
methodsIn this post hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO PE trial, we compared the 18-month and 6-month rivaroxaban treatment groups in 2 subgroups: the low PS score (no restricted physical activity: PS=0; n=79) and high PS score (restricted physical activity: PS ≥1; n=99) subgroups. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism, and the major secondary end point was major bleeding.
resultsThe rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 18-month rivaroxaban group than in the 6-month rivaroxaban group, significantly among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 19.0%,
conclusionsExtended anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism might have a potential benefit in reducing thrombotic risk irrespective of PS score, whereas there might be some concerns on an increased risk of major bleeding in patients with a high PS score. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04724460.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.