ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Identification of Common Blood Metabolic Derangements Using Magnetic Resonance Signatures of the Pancreas and Liver.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition on Regional and Total Pancreatic T1 Relaxation Times at 3.0 Tesla MRI.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether common disturbances of glucose and lipid metabolism can be automatically identified from magnetic resonance signatures of the pancreas and liver.
methodsIn this proof-of-principle study, 100 individuals with a history of pancreatitis-a relatively homogeneous population at risk for metabolic derangements-underwent magnetic resonance assessment on the same 3.0 Tesla scanner. Automated measurements of fat fraction and water proton transverse relaxation time (R2 water) in the pancreas and liver were obtained. Fasting blood samples were analysed for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose and insulin. Associations between magnetic resonance signatures and blood metabolic measures were assessed using generalised additive models adjusted for age, sex and body mass index.
resultsIn fully adjusted models, HDL dyslipidaemia was significantly associated with intra-pancreatic fat (p = 0.015) and intra-hepatic fat (p = 0.047), LDL dyslipidaemia with pancreas R2 water (p = 0.009), and triglyceride dyslipidaemia with intra-hepatic fat (p = 0.046). Lower HOMA-β was significantly associated with intra-pancreatic fat (p = 0.001), intra-hepatic fat (p = 0.004), pancreas R2 water (p = 0.031) and liver R2 water (p = 0.014). Higher HOMA-IR was significantly associated with pancreas R2 water (p = 0.016).
conclusionsAutomated magnetic resonance signatures of pancreatic and hepatic tissue composition were significantly associated with clinically relevant disturbances in lipid metabolism and indices of glucose homeostasis. These findings support the feasibility of opportunistic, automated detection of abnormal blood metabolic parameters using high-resolution cross-sectional imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.