Observational studyThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026
Automatic acromegaly detection using deep learning on hand images: a multicenter observational study.
Observational study in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automatic acromegaly detection using deep learning on hand images: a multicenter observational study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextAcromegaly poses clinical challenges in terms of early diagnosis and intervention. Therefore, the development of novel diagnostic tools is essential. Although artificial intelligence (AI) models based on external appearance have been proposed, privacy concerns have limited their use.
objectiveTo develop a privacy-conscious deep learning model for detecting acromegaly using hand images.
methodsThis nationwide multicenter study enrolled 716 patients (317 with acromegaly and 399 controls) and 11 480 images from 15 Japanese pituitary centers. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and care received at the participating facilities. Hand images focusing on the dorsal and fist sign, excluding the palm/fingerprint regions, were used to develop the model. The data were split into training/validation (12 centers) and test (3 centers) datasets. A ResNet-50-based model was trained using PyTorch with data augmentation and 5-fold cross-validation. For each patient, the predictions were averaged over 4 images. The performance of the model was compared with that of endocrinologists.
resultsThe model achieved a sensitivity of 0.89, specificity of 0.91, positive predictive value of 0.88, negative predictive value of 0.93, F1-score of 0.89, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96, outperforming specialists (F1-score range: 0.43-0.63).
conclusionThis study highlights the utility of dorsal hand and fist sign as diagnostic clues for acromegaly, which the AI model captured more accurately than endocrinologists. Using this privacy-conscious feature, this model can be deployed in public settings like health checkups. Further validation using larger datasets, including healthy individuals and diverse diseases, is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.