ReviewJournal of foot and ankle research2026
Plantar Fasciitis Research: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010-2024.
Review in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePlantar fasciitis is a common degenerative foot disease that significantly impairs quality of life. The disease is characterized by multifactorial pathogenesis, diverse intervention strategies, and heterogeneous therapeutic effects. Despite extensive research findings, the fragmented nature of these results hinders a comprehensive understanding of the field.
methodsThis study employed a bibliometric approach to analyze the literature data obtained from the Web of Science database over the past 15 years. The aim was to explore the knowledge structure, research trends, and collaborative features of this field from a quantitative perspective using bibliometric analysis.
resultsThe study revealed a fluctuating trend in publications within the field, with the United States, Harvard Medical School, and Karl B. Landorf leading the research output and collaboration. Foot and Ankle International emerged as the most prolific and frequently cited journal in this domain. The research hotspots in this field primarily focus on "plantar fasciitis," "heel pain," and "extracorporeal shock wave therapy." Meanwhile, "shear wave elastography," "plantar fascia thickness," "systematic review," and "musculoskeletal disease" represent the research trends in this field. In addition, this study identifies the literature that has had a significant impact on the field.
conclusionBy organizing the entire research field of plantar fasciitis, this study provides decision support for future clinical practice and scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.