ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2026
Integrating Polygenic Scores with Clinical, Lifestyle, and Social Risk Factors to Improve Heart Failure Risk Prediction.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms and Multi-Omics Integration in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is highly prevalent, high-burden disorder with its prevalence expected to increase. Early detection of HF can reduce morbidity and mortality; therefore, novel early detection methods are needed. Polygenic scores (PGS) can combine common variants across the genome and provide phenotype-specific risk scores. However, there are also many well-known, non-genomic risk factors of HF, in the clinical, lifestyle, and social determinant of health (SDOH) domains, and it is not clear how genetic and non-genetic risk factors collectively contribute to HF risk. To address this question, we assessed whether combining HF PGS with clinical, lifestyle, and SDOH risk factors improves risk prediction. Leveraging data from the All of Us Research Program (n = 22,275), clinical risk factors were aggregated into a clinical risk score (CRS) while lifestyle and SDOH risk factors were aggregated into a polyexposure score (PXS). Feature selection was conducted with LASSO regression and statistical significance thresholding from logistic regression models (p < 0.05). Features were included in the model if they were statistically significant and important in ≥ 95% of 1000 iterations. To assess model performance, logistic regressions with HF case/control status were conducted with each risk score individually, as well as integrated models. The integrated model (PGS + CRS + PXS) performed better than individual risk scores (AUROC = 0.763, AUPRC = 0.047, F1 score = 0.062, balanced accuracy = 0.683). To assess the validity of the CRS and PXS, an integrated model with the PGS along with clinical and exposure risk factors as independent features was also evaluated. Based on AUPRC and F1 score, this integrated risk model (PGS + CRS risk factors + PXS risk factors) performed better than the combining the PGS with the CRS and PXS (AUROC = 0.738, AUPRC = 0.047, F1 score = 0.066, balanced accuracy = 0.657). These findings demonstrate that integration of risk factors across multiple domains can improve HF prediction. Knowing that PGS combined with clinical, lifestyle, and SDOH risk factors is predictive of HF risk provides greater opportunity for the identification of individuals at risk of HF prior to disease onset with the goal of prevention or early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.