ReviewNeurology and therapy2026
The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Developmental Age: A Complementary Tool for Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Prognosis.
Review in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), assessment of disease burden predominantly relies on outcome measures developed and validated in adult populations. The application of these tools to children and adolescents may compromise sensitivity and specificity, potentially resulting in an underestimation of disease impact. Symptoms such as fatigue, mood disorders, and cognitive impairment may present subtly in younger patients and are therefore prone to underrecognition in routine clinical practice. Comprehensive evaluation of pediatric MS requires integration of the perspectives of both patients and their caregivers to fully capture the multidimensional effects of the disease, including psychosocial and functional consequences. Incorporation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine clinical care enables a more patient-centered assessment and supports informed clinical decision-making and personalized disease management. Furthermore, PROMs may provide insight into long-term health trajectories and help identify early predictors of adult outcomes. In recognition of the need for a coordinated global approach, the PROMS Initiative was established in 2019 to promote the development, validation, and implementation of PROMs in both research and clinical settings. Its objectives include facilitating the integration of PROMs into clinical trials, routine care, and regulatory frameworks across adult and pediatric populations. To optimize clinical utility, PROMs should demonstrate validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and their use should be standardized while remaining developmentally appropriate and tailored to age and disease stage. This article summarizes the current landscape of PROM use in pediatric MS and highlights key gaps to guide future research and clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.