ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Associations between chronotype, physical activity and cognition in a free-living setting.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronotype is one’s inherent preferred pattern of sleep and activity within a 24 hour period. Late chronotypes in particular are prevalent among university students and have been associated with differences in physical activity and cognitive performance compared to earlier chronotypes. While these effects have been studied in isolation and in controlled settings, the interaction between chronotype, cognition and physical activity in free-living settings has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between self-reported chronotype, objective physical activity patterns, and cognitive performance in a naturalistic setting. Seventy-five young adults (age = 25 ± 7 years; 57% female) completed the Composite Morningness Questionnaire to classify chronotype, before wearing accelerometers for seven days. During this time participants completed executive function tasks at the start and end of the day, without modifying their regular sleep-wake hours. Early chronotypes were more physically active compared to late chronotypes, had an earlier time of peak activity, and exhibited shorter reaction times and fewer errors compared to late chronotypes, particularly in the morning. In fully adjusted models, end-of-day testing as well as being active in the hour prior to testing were associated with better cognitive performance. These results suggest that in free living settings, early chronotypes are associated with both better executive function and higher activity levels in the morning, but that activity levels can improve cognitive performance regardless of time of day. Further research could consider whether physical activity could be leveraged to support morning cognitive function in real-world contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.